Showing posts with label bureaucracy. Show all posts
Showing posts with label bureaucracy. Show all posts

Friday, 5 February 2010

Identity might be cheap... to some


Going overseas requires proper passports, this is to do with the establishment of identity. Indeed the peculiar issue of the status of marriage certificates (see here) is exactly about this issue; though it is to be noted that even though Marriage Celebrants (such as myself) will now be issuing certificates that are numbered, these will not be "official" and couples will still be required to purchase an evidentiary certificate from the registrar. This is also the case with birth certificates, at least in SA, new-borns although registered are only ever given an 'extract' and a full certificate also needs to be 'purchased'.
As only full certificates are acceptable means of proof one wonders why they are not issued instead of these non-acceptable means. Why are you required to pay an extra $30-$60 for a document that, in reality, everyone is required to have?
Don't get me wrong I think we should have legitimate and authenticated certificates of birth and marriage, it has long concerned me that the process of registering marriages is far too loose. I wonder how many people have found out years after they were married that some hiccup has occurred (like the documents were lost in the mail, or the envelope never got posted) and the marriage was never fully registered. No receipt or counterfoil, for example, is issued to either celebrant or bride and groom to say that the official lodgement process was completed. I have at least on one occasion found forms that I thought I had posted off a couple of weeks later (I now make a point of posting off forms on my way home from the wedding).
Passports, too, that are lost or stolen will now cost at least an extra $50 (on top of the application fee) to replace.
Identity is a costly business.

Saturday, 6 October 2007

Inclined to agree

No one will be surprised to discover that new Australian Workplace Agreements are being "sent back to the drawing board" at a rate of two to one. (here)
The opportunistic Opposition cites this as a failure of  process but I think that analysis is poor.
What would be more alarming is if 90 per cent were being approved and there was a huge outcry that they were not being properly scrutinised by the Workplace Authority. That is clearly not the case.
That there is a huge bureaucratic workload, there can be little doubt. This is not surprising in a new system (in our tin pot little organisation for example a new licensing system has taken over eighteen months to process and we are only talking about a couple of thousand licenses).
I don't doubt there will be further problems, but I would have thought that over-cautious scrutiny is a good thing rather than a bad thing.