data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d0495/d0495a27b03e0ee5295a84beffee5c04011525bd" alt=""
But curiously there have been none.
What! The skies have not fallen in.
In fact, it all seems to be a bit ho-hum.
Exactly what we all predicted.
We have spent over a 100 million pursuing a questionnaire no one wanted, which exaggerated popular fears and which told us what we all already knew.
I am personally glad, as a priest-religious celebrant that we have taken this step.
I doubt, that I as a priest of the Anglican Church, under the rules of our organisation will live to see a marriage between two men or two women, or intersex men and/or women in one of our 'hallowed precincts'. While I am sad about that I do get it.
And, as I choose to remain an Anglican, I endure that sadness.
Sorry because I think we can do better, as our Scottish, New Zealand, American & Canadian sisters and brothers have done and will do.
Meanwhile I am 'bemused' and totally GLAD that Australia has so embraced Marriage Equality that it is a non-issue
1 comment:
I must say I struggle with the prospect that the “rules” will help to perpetuate the inequality. I went to a service today, where anyone celebrating an anniversary or birthday were called to the front of the congregation and were “interviewed” by the priest about their marriage/love. The publeic celebration of their love was touching but I couldn’t help but feel desperately sad for those that could not participate. Inclusivity and the real focus on love for all is what made me feel relatively comfortable coming to services. I did not feel comfortable today. Gisela
Post a Comment